Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing ; (36): 2555-2561, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-864828

ABSTRACT

Objective:To assess the effects of not monitoring gastric residual volume compared to the routine monitoring gastric residual volume on the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia.Methods:A systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM and WanFang Database was conducted from inception up to January 2019.Two independent reviewers screened potentially eligible articles, selected eligible studies and abstracted pertinent data. Relative risk ( RR), weighted mean difference ( MD), and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated and heterogeneity was assessed with the I2test. Results:Four studies with a total of 785 patients were included in this meta-analysis. No monitoring gastric residual volume did not significantly increase the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia ( RR=1.30, 95% CI 0.78-2.16, P=0.32), compared with monitoring gastric residual volume. However, the incidence of vomiting in the no monitoring gastric residual volume group is higher ( RR=1.52, 95% CI 1.20-1.91, P=0.000 4). Not monitoring gastric residual volume decreased the rate of feeding intolerance in critically ill patients ( RR=0.61, 95% CI 0.51-0.72, P<0.01).There were no differences in the duration of mechanical ventilation ( MD=0.39, 95% CI -0.70-1.47, P=0.49) and ICU length of stay ( MD=-0.19, 95% CI -1.55--1.16, P=0.78). Conclusion:The absence of monitoring gastric residual volume did not increase the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically patient with mechanical ventilation. Gastric residual volume monitoring can not be used as a maker to prevent aspiration and to assess feeding intolerance. We still need to conduct large-scale,well-desighed clinical trials to verify whether gastric residual volume monitoring can be eliminated.

2.
Chinese Journal of Nursing ; (12): 934-937, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-610994

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate the effects of endotracheal suctioning,turning over,oral caring and swallowingon cuff pressure,so as to provide evidence for the management of the endotracheal cuff.Methods During continuous monitoring of cuff pressure with pressure sensor,the changes of cuff pressure were recorded in the process of endotracheal suctioning,turning over,and oral caring.The data of cuff pressure were recorded including before activity,during activity,after activity for 5 min,15 min and 30 min.In addition,the data of cuff pressure were recorded including before swallowing,during swallowing,after swallowing for 1 min,5 min and 10 min.Results The cuff pressure during endotracheal suctioning and after endotracheal suctioning for 5 min was higher than that before endotracheal suctioning,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05);the cuff pressure during turning over and after turning over for 5 min was higher than that before turning over,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05);the cuff pressure during the oral caring was higher than that before oral caring,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);the cuff pressure during swallowing was higher than that before swallowing,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion These clinical factors would lead to transient increase of cuff pressure including suctioning,turning over,oral caring,and swallowing.The instantaneous cuff pressure will mislead the staff to judge the safey of endotracheal cuff.The cuff pressure should not be blindly adjusted,so as to avoid the risks of leakage and aspiration.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL